CO129-337 - Public Offices & Foreign Office - 1906 — Page 825

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

638

TOME

The

TOO

to eojuhi Saldu noire gi 10% Ived ston 10.7 e " 3 menn vo“ nescidi evi. Ino. Laborirong orid to awolv * ut HaW 3 nem Saouutise onom ust anotë?\noo -Toteoly Iskonivord

Shanghai anking Railway's Loan Agreement could not be made applicable to the present negotiations. He contested the validity of the preliminary agreement because the corporation was not entrusted with the construction of the entire line from Canton to Kowloon city, maintaining that the building of the railway between these two points by the Corporation was an essential condition of that agreement, whereas it now appeared that the Corporation was only concerned with the section in Chinese territory. He claimed for the Chinese Government the same discretionary powers as those exercised by the Hong Kong Government.

814

MR. BLAND in reply stated that at the time of sanctioning the preliminary agreement of March 1899, the Chinese Government was fully aware that the Corporation's construction rights were limited to Chinese territory, that the expression "British claimed Kowloon" in Clause 1 of that Agreement could only mean the frontier of the leased territory and was never intended to mean Kowloon city.

Ty the concession granted in September 1898 the Corporation was given the right to finance and build a Chinese Railway in Chinese territory on terms not less favourable than the Luhan concession; several points had already been conceded to meet the views of the Chinese Government and in view of conditions admittedly altered since that date, but H.E.'s present proposals were tantamount to denial of all rights and advantages under the concession.

H.E. Tang Shao-Yi, after consultation with the Canton Viceroy's delegates, stated that the terms offered could not be further modified and Mr. Bland, being unable to accept them, undertook to report the situation to the Board and to convey their reply in due course.

The meeting then proceeded to consider the remaining clauses of the Canton Viceroy's proposals.

Article 10. To discussion to #met ex lalo nedan: Il-gar" ynsî .4.H kerenat

Article 11.

Edit History

2026-06-02 18:42:10 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
638 TOME The TOO to eojuhi Saldu noire gi 10% Ived ston 10.7 e " 3 menn vo“ nescidi evi. Ino. Laborirong orid to awolv * ut HaW 3 nem Saouutise onom ust anotë?\noo -Toteoly Iskonivord Shanghai anking Railway's Loan Agreement could not be made applicable to the present negotiations. He contested the validity of the preliminary agreement because the corporation was not entrusted with the construction of the entire line from Canton to Kowloon city, maintaining that the building of the railway between these two points by the Corporation was an essential condition of that agreement, whereas it now appeared that the Corporation was only concerned with the section in Chinese territory. He claimed for the Chinese Government the same discretionary powers as those exercised by the Hong Kong Government. 814 MR. BLAND in reply stated that at the time of sanctioning the preliminary agreement of March 1899, the Chinese Government was fully aware that the Corporation's construction rights were limited to Chinese territory, that the expression "British claimed Kowloon" in Clause 1 of that Agreement could only mean the frontier of the leased territory and was never intended to mean Kowloon city. Ty the concession granted in September 1898 the Corporation was given the right to finance and build a Chinese Railway in Chinese territory on terms not less favourable than the Luhan concession; several points had already been conceded to meet the views of the Chinese Government and in view of conditions admittedly altered since that date, but H.E.'s present proposals were tantamount to denial of all rights and advantages under the concession. H.E. Tang Shao-Yi, after consultation with the Canton Viceroy's delegates, stated that the terms offered could not be further modified and Mr. Bland, being unable to accept them, undertook to report the situation to the Board and to convey their reply in due course. The meeting then proceeded to consider the remaining clauses of the Canton Viceroy's proposals. Article 10. To discussion to #met ex lalo nedan: Il-gar" ynsî .4.H kerenat Article 11.
Baseline (Original)
Indeed. 638 TOME The TOO to eojuhi Saldu noire gi 10% Ived ston 10.7 e " 3 menn vo“ nescidi evi. Ino. Laborirong orid to awolv * ut HaW 3 nem Saouutise onom ust anotë?\noo -Toteoly Iskonivord Shanghai anking Railway's Loan Agreement could not be m applicable to the present negotiations. He contested the validity of the preliminary agrement because the fórpora- tion was not entrusted with te construction of the entire line from Canton to Kowloon city maintaining that the build- ing of the railway between these two points by the Cor- poration was an essential condition of that agreement, whereas it now a peared that the Corporation was only concerned with the section in Chinese territory. He claimed for the Chinese Government the same discretoonary powers as those exercised by the longkong Goverment. 814 MR. BLANT in reply stated that at the time of sanctioning the preliminary agreement of March 1899, the Chinese Goverment was fully aware that the Corporation's construction rights were limited to Chinese territory, that the expression "British elaimed (inoso Keren Kowloon" in Clause 1 of and that Agreement could only mean the frontier of the leased territory and was never intended to mean Kowloon city. Ty the concession granted in September 1898 the Corporation was given the right to finance and build a Chinese Railway in Chinese territory on terms not less favourable than the Luhan concessioni several pointe had already been conceded to meet the views of the Chinese Government and in view of conditions admittedly altered since that date, but H,E.'s present roposals were tantamount to denial of all rights and advantages under the concession. H.E. Tang Shao-Yi after consultation with the Canton Viceroy's delegates, stated that the terms offerred could not be further modified and r. Bland, being unable to accept them, undertook to report the situation to the Board and to convey their reply in due course. Themeeting then proceeded to consider the remaining clauses of the nton Viceroy's proposals. Article 10. To discussion to #met ex lalo nedan: Il-gar" ynsî .4.H keranat Article 11. མ༩“*ཡལ་ནཁཐཾ-sརོ་ ཙ་༧
2026-06-02 18:42:10 · Baseline
View content

Indeed.

638

TOME

The

TOO

to eojuhi

Saldu noire gi

10%

Ived ston

10.7 e

"

3 menn vo“ nescidi evi. Ino. Laborirong orid to awolv

* ut HaW 3 nem

Saouutise onom ust anotë?\noo

-Toteoly Iskonivord

Shanghai anking Railway's Loan Agreement could not be m applicable to the present negotiations. He contested the validity of the preliminary agrement because the fórpora- tion was not entrusted with te construction of the entire line from Canton to Kowloon city maintaining that the build- ing of the railway between these two points by the Cor- poration was an essential condition of that agreement, whereas it now a peared that the Corporation was only concerned with the section in Chinese territory. He claimed for the Chinese Government the same discretoonary powers as those exercised by the longkong Goverment.

814

MR. BLANT in reply stated that at the time of sanctioning the preliminary agreement of March 1899, the Chinese Goverment was fully aware that the Corporation's construction rights were limited to Chinese territory, that the expression "British elaimed

(inoso Keren Kowloon" in Clause 1 of

and

that Agreement could only mean the frontier of the leased territory and was never intended to mean Kowloon city.

Ty

the concession granted in September 1898 the Corporation was given the right to finance and build a Chinese Railway in Chinese territory on terms not less favourable than the Luhan concessioni several pointe had already been conceded to meet the views of the Chinese Government and in view

of conditions admittedly altered since that date, but H,E.'s present roposals were tantamount to denial of all rights

and advantages under the concession.

H.E. Tang Shao-Yi after consultation with the Canton Viceroy's delegates, stated that the terms offerred could

not be further modified and r. Bland, being unable to

accept them, undertook to report the situation to the

Board and to convey their reply in due course.

Themeeting then proceeded to consider the remaining clauses of the nton Viceroy's proposals.

Article 10. To discussion

to #met ex lalo nedan: Il-gar" ynsî .4.H

keranat

Article 11.

མ༩“*ཡལ་ནཁཐཾ-sརོ་ ཙ་༧

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.